Skip to main content
File #: VA-2321    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Planning Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/31/2023 In control: Planning and Zoning Board
On agenda: 11/8/2023 Final action:
Title: VA-2321: Request to allow the construction of a detached garage at 1,380 square feet, 130 square feet greater than the existing single-family home which exceeds the 60 percent maximum allowance for accessory structures in accordance with Article 3, Section 21-36.02(k) for the property located at 2609 Queen Palm Drive.
Attachments: 1. Survey, 2. Plans, 3. Engineering, 4. Aerial Map
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Title
VA-2321: Request to allow the construction of a detached garage at 1,380 square feet, 130 square feet greater than the existing single-family home which exceeds the 60 percent maximum allowance for accessory structures in accordance with Article 3, Section 21-36.02(k) for the property located at 2609 Queen Palm Drive.
Body
OWNER:
Toby Clouser

LOT SIZE:
160 feet in width by 125 feet in depth = 20,000 square feet.

Principle Structure is 2,082 square feet.

60% of 2,082 = 1,249 square feet.

PROPOSED USE:
Garage

CURRENT LAND USE:
Single-Family Home with Pool

FLUM DESIGNATION:
Low Density Residential

ZONING DISTRICT:
R-2



VOTING DISTRICT:
District 3, Councilwoman Debbie Dolbow

SURROUNDING AREA:


Current Land Use
FLUM Designation
Zoning District
North
Single-Family
Low Density Residential

R-2
East
Single-Family
Low Density Residential

R-2
South
Single-Family
Low Density Residential
R-2
West
Single-Family
Low Density Residential
R-2
Explanation of hardship by applicant: I have a lot more vehicles than I have space to keep them. To have the plans for the garage redone would cost substantially more than a variance.

According to Section 21-100.04(d), Non-Administrative Variance, City of Edgewater's Land Development Code; In order to grant a non-administrative variance, the P&ZB shall make the following findings of fact:

1. That granting of the proposed variance is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan;
2. That granting of the proposed variance will not result in creating or continuing a use which is not compatible with adjacent uses in the area;
3. That granting of the proposed variance is the minimum action available to permit reasonable use of the property;
4. That the physical characteristics of the subject site are unique and not present on adjacent sites; and
5. That the circumstances creating the need for the variance are not the result of actions by the applicant, actions proposed by the applicant or actions b...

Click here for full text