Legislation Details

File #: VA-2605    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Planning Item Status: Passed
File created: 4/8/2026 In control: Planning and Zoning Board
On agenda: 4/15/2026 Final action: 4/15/2026
Title: VA-2605: Request for a variance to allow a six-foot (6') fence on the property line in lieu of the required ten-foot (10') side corner yard setback for the property located at 202 Hubbell Street, Edgewater, FL 32132.
Attachments: 1. Public Notice Aerial Map, 2. Survey
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Title
VA-2605: Request for a variance to allow a six-foot (6') fence on the property line in lieu of the required ten-foot (10') side corner yard setback for the property located at 202 Hubbell Street, Edgewater, FL 32132.
Body
OWNER/APPLICANT:
Thad Harty

PROPOSED USE:
Corner lot fence height (6') for yard and side property line.

REQUESTED ACTION:
Per Article III, Section 21-38.02 (d.) to allow a six-foot (6') opaque fence on the property line in lieu of the side corner yard setback of 10 feet for the Lamont side of the parcel.

PARCEL ID:
7452-10-00-0051

AREA:
0.28 acres

CURRENT LAND USE:
Single Family Residential

FLUM DESIGNATION:
Low Density Residential

ZONING DISTRICT:
R-3, Single Family Residential

VOTING DISTRICT:
District One - Council Person: Charlotte Hope Gillis
Discussion:
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a six-foot (6') fence on the property line in lieu of the required ten-foot (10') side corner yard setback. Per Article III, Section 21-38.02, General Requirements, (d.), of the Land Development Code, fences located within a side corner yard are required to maintain a minimum setback of ten feet (10') from the property line. Applicant previously got an approved variance to construct a new residential home ten feet (10') from the property line.





Staff Review:

According to Article IX, Section 21-100.04(d), Non-Administrative Variance, City of Edgewater's Land Development Code;
In order to grant a non-administrative variance, the P. & Z. Board shall make the following findings of fact:

1. That granting of the proposed variance is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan;
2. That granting of the proposed variance will not result in creating or continuing a use which is not compatible with adjacent uses in the area;
3. That granting of the proposed variance is the minimum action available to permit reasonable use of the property;
4. That the physical characteristics of the subject...

Click here for full text