Skip to main content
File #: VA-2315    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Planning Item Status: Passed
File created: 10/6/2023 In control: Planning and Zoning Board
On agenda: 10/11/2023 Final action: 10/11/2023
Title: VA-2315: Request to allow a swimming pool and cage within 3.5 feet of the rear property line in lieu of the required 5-foot setback from the rear property line in accordance with Article III, Section 21-36.09(d)(2).
Attachments: 1. Survey, 2. Rendering, 3. Aerial Map
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Title
VA-2315: Request to allow a swimming pool and cage within 3.5 feet of the rear property line in lieu of the required 5-foot setback from the rear property line in accordance with Article III, Section 21-36.09(d)(2).
Body

Parcel ID#: 844803000010

Proposed use: Inground Pool

Explanation of hardship by applicant: We are unable to build on the south side of the property as it is considered a front yard. Coming in from the property line will only allow 10 feet of pool space.

According to Section 21-100.04(d), Non-Administrative Variance, City of Edgewater's Land Development Code; In order to grant a non-administrative variance, the P&ZB shall make the following findings of fact:

1. That granting of the proposed variance is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan;
2. That granting of the proposed variance will not result in creating or continuing a use which is not compatible with adjacent uses in the area;
3. That granting of the proposed variance is the minimum action available to permit reasonable use of the property;
4. That the physical characteristics of the subject site are unique and not present on adjacent sites; and
5. That the circumstances creating the need for the variance are not the result of actions by the applicant, actions proposed by the applicant or actions by the previous property owner(s).
6. That granting of the proposed variance(s) will not cause substantial detriment to the public welfare or impair the purposes and intent of the Land Development Code.












1. Will granting the proposed variance result in a conflict with the Comprehensive Plan?
a. Staff's response: After review, Staff has determined that granting the variance would not result in a conflict with the Comprehensive Plan.
i. Yes, granting the variance would further Objective 1.4 which is to discourage urban sprawl and encourage redevelopment.
i. Policy 1.4.1: Limiting Development and the Utility Service Area:
1. The City will limit land deve...

Click here for full text