Legislation Details

File #: VA-2407    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Planning Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/2/2024 In control: Planning and Zoning Board
On agenda: 4/10/2024 Final action:
Title: VA-2407: Request for a variance from Article III to allow for the construction of a swimming pool within the 10' property line setback at 2303 Royal Palm Dr.
Attachments: 1. Aerial Map, 2. Survey, 3. Plans
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Title
VA-2407: Request for a variance from Article III to allow for the construction of a swimming pool within the 10' property line setback at 2303 Royal Palm Dr.
Body
OWNER/APPLICANT:
Karl and Lisa Johnson

PROPOSED USE:
Swimming pool to be built 5.4' from the rear property line.

REQUESTED ACTION:
1. Article III, Section 21-36.09(d)(2): to allow a swimming pool to be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the rear property line.

PARCEL ID:
840201090450

AREA:
0.34 acres

CURRENT LAND USE:
Single-Family Home

FLUM DESIGNATION:
Low Density Residential

ZONING DISTRICT:
R-2

VOTING DISTRICT:
District 2 - Councilwoman Gigi Bennington

Explanation of hardship by applicant: Requesting 5' variance for pool and screen enclosure but still allows pool to stay within fenced area.


According to Article IX, Section 21-100.04(d), Non-Administrative Variance, City of Edgewater's Land Development Code;
In order to grant a non-administrative variance, the P. & Z. Board shall make the following findings of fact:

1. That granting of the proposed variance is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan;
2. That granting of the proposed variance will not result in creating or continuing a use which is not compatible with adjacent uses in the area;
3. That granting of the proposed variance is the minimum action available to permit reasonable use of the property;
4. That the physical characteristics of the subject site are unique and not present on adjacent sites; and
5. That the circumstances creating the need for the variance are not the result of actions by the applicant, actions proposed by the applicant or actions by the previous property owner(s).
6. That granting of the proposed variance(s) will not cause substantial detriment to the public welfare or impair the purposes and intent of the Land Development Code.

1. Will granting the proposed variance result in a conflict with the Comprehensive Plan?
a. Staff's response: After review, St...

Click here for full text