Skip to main content
File #: VA-2517    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Planning Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 12/3/2025 In control: Planning and Zoning Board
On agenda: 12/10/2025 Final action:
Title: VA-2517: Request for a variance from Article V to allow a carport extension for the property at 752 Navigators Way.
Attachments: 1. Public Notice Aerial Map, 2. Survey, 3. Site Plan
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Title
VA-2517: Request for a variance from Article V to allow a carport extension for the property at 752 Navigators Way.
Body
OWNER/APPLICANT:
Charles or Deborah Irvine, Owner.

PROPOSED USE:
To add a 20 x 16 ft. carport addition to the current residence.

REQUESTED ACTION: (Change to current code)
1. Per Article V, Table V-1 allow an increased max build of 43.11%, versus the zoning MH-2 requirement of 30%.
2. Per Article V, Table V-1 to allow 10.5' front yard setback from the property line versus the 25 feet from cartway.
PARCEL ID:
8401-02-00-3630

AREA:
0.18 acres

CURRENT LAND USE:
Mobile Home

FLUM DESIGNATION:
Medium Density Residential

ZONING DISTRICT:
MH-2, Manufactured Home Subdivision

VOTING DISTRICT:
District Four - Council Person Eric Rainbird
Discussion:
The applicant is requesting a variance from Max Build requirements from the Land Development Code Table V-1, which requires a max build percentage of 30%. Applicant has a residence that has a current max build percentage of 37.82% which is over the allowable max build of 30% and wants to add a carport to the structure, which will increase the max build to 43.11%. Applicant would like carport to house a solar system and provide a place to park his cars.

Aerial:

Site Plan:


Staff Review:

According to Article IX, Section 21-100.04(d), Non-Administrative Variance, City of Edgewater's Land Development Code;
In order to grant a non-administrative variance, the P. & Z. Board shall make the following findings of fact:

1. That granting of the proposed variance is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan;
2. That granting of the proposed variance will not result in creating or continuing a use which is not compatible with adjacent uses in the area;
3. That granting of the proposed variance is the minimum action available to permit reasonable use of the property;
4. That the physical characteristics of the subjec...

Click here for full text