Legislation Details

File #: VA-2625    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Planning Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/6/2026 In control: Planning and Zoning Board
On agenda: 10/14/2026 Final action:
Title: VA-2625: Request for a Non-Administrative Variance to allow a proposed concrete driveway along property line of an unimproved road for the property located at 1903 Willow Oak Drive.
Attachments: 1. Aerial, 2. Application, 3. Site Plan, 4. VA- 2625- PUBLIC NOTICE- Postcard - FOR REVIEW ONLY, 5. VA-2625- Staff Report Variance- FOR REVIEW ONLY
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Body
OWNER/APPLICANT:
Joseph Driggers - Applicant / Owner

PROPOSED USE:
“Concrete driveway for perking, access, storage, etc.”

REQUESTED ACTION:
Per Article V, Section 21-52-02 (e) to allow a driveway 1.5 ft from the property line of an unimproved road in lieu of the required 5-feet, based on the requirement in Article V requiring the structure to meet a 5-foot setback from the property line.
PARCEL ID:
8402-01-04-4300

AREA:
0.23± acres

CURRENT LAND USE:
Single Family Residential

FLUM DESIGNATION:
Low Density Residential

ZONING DISTRICT:
R-2, Single Family Residential

VOTING DISTRICT:
District Two – Council Person: Mike Thomas
Discussion:
Under Article V, Sections 21-52.02(e) no driveway shall be closer than five feet (5’) to any lot line or encroachment into any side or rear easement.
The applicant is seeking to add a 10’ X 70’ driveway on the parcel up 1.5 feet from the property line on the unimproved side of the lot. The applicant is proposing a 4” think drive with a 6” think apron. It is planning and zoning departments recommendation to have the board discuss a culver addition during the meeting.
Staff Review:

According to Article IX, Section 21-100.04(d), Non-Administrative Variance, City of Edgewater’s Land Development Code;
In order to grant a Non-Administrative Variance, the Planning and Zoning Board shall make the following findings of fact:

That granting of the proposed variance is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan;
That granting of the proposed variance will not result in creating or continuing a use which is not compatible with adjacent uses in the area;
That granting of the proposed variance is the minimum action available to permit reasonable use of the property;
That the physical characteristics of the subject site are unique and not present on adjacent sites; and
That the circumstances creating the need for the variance are not the result of actions by the applicant, actions proposed by the applicant or actions...

Click here for full text