Skip to main content
File #: VA-2317    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Planning Item Status: Passed
File created: 10/6/2023 In control: Planning and Zoning Board
On agenda: 10/11/2023 Final action: 10/11/2023
Title: VA-2317: Request to allow the construction of a detached garage (greater than 250 square feet) with a rear yard setback of 6' in lieu of the required setback of 20 feet within the R-2 zoning designation in accordance with Article V, Table V-1.
Attachments: 1. Plan, 2. Aerial Map
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Title
VA-2317: Request to allow the construction of a detached garage (greater than 250 square feet) with a rear yard setback of 6' in lieu of the required setback of 20 feet within the R-2 zoning designation in accordance with Article V, Table V-1.
Body
Parcel ID#: 840201116080

Proposed use: 2 Car Garage

Explanation of hardship by applicant: Transition to drive too steep at 20-foot setback, need 6 feet.

According to Section 21-100.04(d), Non-Administrative Variance, City of Edgewater's Land Development Code; In order to grant a non-administrative variance, the P&ZB shall make the following findings of fact:

1. That granting of the proposed variance is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan;
2. That granting of the proposed variance will not result in creating or continuing a use which is not compatible with adjacent uses in the area;
3. That granting of the proposed variance is the minimum action available to permit reasonable use of the property;
4. That the physical characteristics of the subject site are unique and not present on adjacent sites; and
5. That the circumstances creating the need for the variance are not the result of actions by the applicant, actions proposed by the applicant or actions by the previous property owner(s).
6. That granting of the proposed variance(s) will not cause substantial detriment to the public welfare or impair the purposes and intent of the Land Development Code.


1. Will granting the proposed variance result in a conflict with the Comprehensive Plan?
a. Staff's response: After review, Staff has determined that granting the variance would not result in a conflict with the Comprehensive Plan.
i. Yes, granting the variance would further Objective 1.4 which is to discourage urban sprawl and encourage redevelopment.
i. Policy 1.4.1: Limiting Development and the Utility Service Area:
1. The City will limit land development activities outside of the adopted Utility Service Area boundary to encourag...

Click here for full text