Legislation Details

File #: VA-2501    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Planning Item Status: Failed
File created: 5/7/2025 In control: Planning and Zoning Board
On agenda: 5/14/2025 Final action: 5/14/2025
Title: VA-2501: Request for variances to allow encroachment into a side yard setback, pool setback, a height variance, and a fa?ade variance for a detached garage at 1866 Banyan Drive.
Attachments: 1. Plot Plan, 2. Survey
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Title
VA-2501: Request for variances to allow encroachment into a side yard setback, pool setback, a height variance, and a fa?ade variance for a detached garage at 1866 Banyan Drive.
Body
OWNER/APPLICANT:
Christopher and Erica Lucas

PROPOSED USE:
Applicant is requesting a variance to build a garage for automobiles and driveway from 19th to access said garage.

REQUESTED ACTION: (Change to current code)
1. Article V Table V-1 - Site Dimensions Minimum side yard setback from 10' to 5'.
2. Article III- section 21-36.09- swimming pools (d.) to allow the pool to be 3' from the accessory pool structure.
3. Article III, section 21-36.02- general regulations (m.) exemption from consistency of architectural design, exterior construction materials or fa?ade treatment, roofline and color to match primary structure.
4. Article III, section 21-36.02- general regulations (c.) to allow the accessory structure to be 15' in height which will be 3' higher than the primary which is 12' high.
PARCEL ID:
8402-01-00-0490

AREA:
0.23 acres

CURRENT LAND USE:
Single-family Dwelling

FLUM DESIGNATION:
Low Density Residential

ZONING DISTRICT:
R-2, Single-Family Residential

VOTING DISTRICT:
District One - Council Person Mike Thomas



Discussion:

The applicant is requesting a variance from Article III- sections 21-36.09, 21-36.02 (c) and (m), as well as, from Article V, Table V-1. The applicant is requesting side yard setback of five feet in lieu of ten feet. The applicant has also requested a three foot setback from the pool instead of a five foot setback from the pool structure. The applicant is also requesting to allow the accessory structure to be three feet higher than the primary structure. They are also looking to have an exemption from the consistency of architectural design, exterior construction materials or fa?ade treatment, roofline and color to match primary structure for accessory structures larger than 350 Sq Ft visible from the publ...

Click here for full text