Legislation Details

File #: VA-2525    Version: 2 Name:
Type: Planning Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 12/4/2024 In control: Planning and Zoning Board
On agenda: 12/11/2024 Final action:
Title: VA-2425: Request for variances from Article V to allow for additional parking of commercial vehicles on an unimproved parking lot and on an adjacent parcel for the property at 301 Mango Tree Drive.
Attachments: 1. Survey and Plans
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Title
VA-2425: Request for variances from Article V to allow for additional parking of commercial vehicles on an unimproved parking lot and on an adjacent parcel for the property at 301 Mango Tree Drive.
Body
OWNER/APPLICANT:
Timothy Loomis

PROPOSED USE:
Additional overflow parking for commercial vehicles.

REQUESTED ACTION: (Change to current code)
1. Article V, Section 21-56.02 (a) to allow parking on an adjacent parcel than which they are intended to serve.
2. Article V, Section 21-56.02 (k) to allow parking on an unimproved surface.

PARCEL ID:
7452-01-00-0440

AREA:
0.88 acres

CURRENT LAND USE:
Industrial Building

FLUM DESIGNATION:
Industrial

ZONING DISTRICT:
I-1 Light Industrial

VOTING DISTRICT:
District One - Council Person Charlotte Hope Gillis













Discussion:

The applicant is requesting two variances from Article V of the Land Development Code, Section 21-56 Parking and Loading Requirements, to allow for additional overflow parking on an unimproved parking lot on an adjacent parcel. The adjacent parcel is under the same ownership. The parking lot would be contiguous to the existing parking lot to the north of the parcel and has direct ingress/egress access to Mango Tree Drive.


Proposed Plan:

















Staff Review:

According to Article IX, Section 21-100.04(d), Non-Administrative Variance, City of Edgewater's Land Development Code;
In order to grant a non-administrative variance, the P. & Z. Board shall make the following findings of fact:

1. That granting of the proposed variance is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan;
2. That granting of the proposed variance will not result in creating or continuing a use which is not compatible with adjacent uses in the area;
3. That granting of the proposed variance is the minimum action available to permit reasonable use of the property;
4. That the physical characteristics of the subject site are unique and not present on adjacent sites; and
5. T...

Click here for full text