Legislation Details

File #: VA-2405    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Planning Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 3/6/2024 In control: Planning and Zoning Board
On agenda: 3/13/2024 Final action:
Title: VA-2405: Request for a variance from Article III to allow the construction of a 1,500 square foot garage for the property at 3415 Lime Tree Drive.
Attachments: 1. Public Notice Aerial Map, 2. Plan, 3. Engineering Plans
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Title
VA-2405: Request for a variance from Article III to allow the construction of a 1,500 square foot garage for the property at 3415 Lime Tree Drive.
Body
OWNER:
Alan Fischer

PROPOSED USE:
30' x 50' detached garage.

Principle structure is 1,947 square feet. The proposed accessory structure (detached garage) is 1,500 square feet.

REQUESTED ACTION:
1. Article III, Section 21-36.02(c): To allow an accessory structure to exceed the height of the principle structure.
2. Article III, Section 21-36.02(h): To allow an accessory structure to encroach within the setback as described within Article V, Table V-1 by 5 feet in lieu of the requirement of a 10 foot side setback.
3. Article III, Section 21-36.02(k): To allow an accessory structure to exceed 60 percent of the total square footage of the principle structure.
4. Article III, Section 21-36.02(m): To allow an accessory structure in a residentially zoned area exceeding 350 square feet visible from a public right of way to not match the fa?ade and architectural design of the primary structure.
PARCEL ID:
840201085610

CURRENT LAND USE:
Single-Family Home

FLUM DESIGNATION:
Low Density Residential

ZONING DISTRICT:
R-2, Single Family Residential

VOTING DISTRICT:
District 4 - Councilman Jonah Powers

According to Article IX, Section 21-100.04(d), Non-Administrative Variance, City of Edgewater's Land Development Code;
In order to grant a non-administrative variance, the P. & Z. Board shall make the following findings of fact:

1. That granting of the proposed variance is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan;
2. That granting of the proposed variance will not result in creating or continuing a use which is not compatible with adjacent uses in the area;
3. That granting of the proposed variance is the minimum action available to permit reasonable use of the property;
4. That the physical characteristics of the subject site are unique and not present on adjacent sites; and
5. Tha...

Click here for full text